Tuesday, October 21, 2008

On B1 Bombers

Eugene Jarecki, whose documentary "Why We Fight" about the military-industrial-complex was the subject of my first-ever blog post, continues his analysis of how political mandates are manufactured. This thing about the B1 Bomber you're about to read is as brilliant as it is twisted. He then tells us what to do about it.
Today, the B1 Bomber has a piece of it made in every single U.S. state. This simple fact offers a window into a heinous defense industry practice called "political engineering" -- a strategy for the grotesque misuse of taxpayer dollars. Simply put, a loose alliance of actors from the military, industry, and Congress (what Eisenhower first called the "military-industrial-congressional-complex" before removing the word "congressional") work together to ensure that the contracts and subcontracts to produce a given weapons system are distributed as widely as possible across congressional districts. This way, if the program ever comes up for reevaluation, there's a built-in constituency in Congress for its continuation.
He implores all of us who are blowing our collective wads over Democratic nominee Barack Obama to keep him and the Democrats honest as they face this formidable phenomenon known as political engineering. No president -- no matter how inspiring -- can do squat against these mandates without some counterbalance from us, the public.

Aside from ill-conceived comparisons to dieting (you'll have to read the full article for that), his calls for organizing for social change make perfect sense and, more importantly, offer hope. Real hope.
"...[M]ake civic engagement an extension of what you already do for work or play. And the second is to break out of the isolation and individuation that so many of us experience in our television, cell-phone, and computer-dominated existence.

...No matter what our individual vocation, we must follow Margaret Mead's timeless wisdom about the power of small groups of organized people to change the world. In an interconnected age more than ever, we must not toil in isolation but join forces with others to build groupings of pressure-groups - not shadowy think tanks on K street - but everyday organizations in small towns and big towns that fix their attention on a needed area of social change and work tirelessly for it...Just to give an example, if 1,000 people in all 435 congressional districts committed themselves to spend 5 hours a month acting as a watchdog on congressional waste and corruption, making that information public, and demanding transparency and accountability, just think of the impact those 2,175,000 man-hours could have on our system."
Government of the people, right?

No comments: